first commit

docs/api-stack/api/api-tenant-resolver-jwt/src/error-codes/error-codes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+# `error-codes`
+
+<!-- begin:auto-docs -->
+_(no submodules)_
+<!-- end:auto-docs -->
+
+## Purpose
+
+Defines the stable error-code registry for `@suaveplan/api-tenant-resolver-jwt`.
+Every public failure path in the resolver raises a `JwtTenantResolverError`
+carrying one of two namespaced `TENANT_RESOLVER_JWT.*` codes, so downstream
+consumers (chain runners, observability sinks, error-mapping middleware) can
+branch deterministically on the string value rather than on a fragile
+`instanceof` chain or on `error.message` substring matches.
+
+The registry is intentionally small — Stage 4 resolvers do almost no work
+beyond reading a claim — but it is exhaustive: any new failure path MUST
+land here first and then be wired through `JwtTenantResolverError` so the
+public surface stays in lockstep with the spec.
+
+## Features
+
+- Frozen `TENANT_RESOLVER_JWT_CODES` object produced by `defineCodes` so the
+  literal `"TENANT_RESOLVER_JWT.PRINCIPAL_MISSING_TENANT_ID"` is comparable
+  at type-check time.
+- `JwtTenantResolverError` narrows `code` to `JwtTenantResolverErrorCode`,
+  so a single `catch (e: unknown)` branch can refine straight to a known
+  union without further casts.
+- Carries the `JwtTenantResolverErrorCode` redundantly on
+  `jwtTenantResolverCode` for ergonomic destructuring in test harnesses
+  where the generic `code` field is too widely typed.
+
+## Usage: Basic
+
+```ts
+import {
+    JwtTenantResolverError,
+    TENANT_RESOLVER_JWT_CODES,
+} from "@suaveplan/api-tenant-resolver-jwt/error-codes";
+
+try {
+    // …call createJwtTenantResolver(...).resolve(req)
+} catch (error: unknown) {
+    if (error instanceof JwtTenantResolverError) {
+        if (error.code === TENANT_RESOLVER_JWT_CODES.PRINCIPAL_MISSING_TENANT_ID) {
+            // strict-mode rejected — return a 401
+        }
+    }
+}
+```
+
+## Usage: Advanced
+
+```ts
+import {
+    JwtTenantResolverError,
+    TENANT_RESOLVER_JWT_CODES,
+} from "@suaveplan/api-tenant-resolver-jwt/error-codes";
+
+function classify(error: unknown): "invalid-options" | "missing-principal" | "other" {
+    if (!(error instanceof JwtTenantResolverError)) return "other";
+    switch (error.jwtTenantResolverCode) {
+        case TENANT_RESOLVER_JWT_CODES.INVALID_OPTIONS:
+            return "invalid-options";
+        case TENANT_RESOLVER_JWT_CODES.PRINCIPAL_MISSING_TENANT_ID:
+            return "missing-principal";
+    }
+}
+```
+
+## API Reference
+
+- `TENANT_RESOLVER_JWT_CODES` — `Readonly<Record<"PRINCIPAL_MISSING_TENANT_ID" | "INVALID_OPTIONS", string>>`.
+- `JwtTenantResolverErrorCode` — string union of the two registry values.
+- `JwtTenantResolverError extends SuaveplanError<JwtTenantResolverErrorCode>` —
+  constructor `(code, message, options?)`; exposes `jwtTenantResolverCode`.
+
+## Implementation Notes
+
+`defineCodes` produces a frozen registry where every value is the literal
+`"TENANT_RESOLVER_JWT.<KEY>"`. The class redundantly stores the code on
+`jwtTenantResolverCode` to side-step the wider `SuaveplanError<string>`
+typing that some toolchains see when the type parameter is erased through
+re-export. Codes are append-only — never rename or remove an entry, or
+downstream branches break silently across a version bump.

docs/api-stack/api/api-tenant-resolver-jwt/src/options/options.md

@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+# `options`
+
+<!-- begin:auto-docs -->
+_(no submodules)_
+<!-- end:auto-docs -->
+
+## Purpose
+
+Defines and validates the `JwtTenantResolverOptions` accepted by
+`createJwtTenantResolver`. The options shape is deliberately narrow — Stage 4
+adapters do almost no work — but every field is Zod-validated at construction
+time so a typo in `claimKey` or a boolean coerced from a string never reaches
+the per-request hot path. Construction-time failures throw
+`JwtTenantResolverError(INVALID_OPTIONS)` so the host surfaces a stable error
+code rather than a raw `ZodError`.
+
+The parser also fills in defaults (`id = "jwt"`, `claimKey = "tenantId"`,
+`requirePrincipal = false`), so the resolver implementation can treat its
+options as fully-resolved `Required<…>` and avoid scattering `??` defaults
+through the request path.
+
+## Features
+
+- `JwtTenantResolverOptions` — three optional fields covering the entire
+  configuration surface (`id`, `claimKey`, `requirePrincipal`).
+- `parseJwtTenantResolverOptions(input)` — strict Zod parser; rejects
+  unknown keys, empty strings, and non-boolean values.
+- Pure: no I/O, no side effects, no module-level state — safe to call from
+  module-init code.
+
+## Usage: Basic
+
+```ts
+import { parseJwtTenantResolverOptions } from "@suaveplan/api-tenant-resolver-jwt/options";
+
+const resolved = parseJwtTenantResolverOptions(undefined);
+// → { id: "jwt", claimKey: "tenantId", requirePrincipal: false }
+```
+
+## Usage: Advanced
+
+```ts
+import {
+    parseJwtTenantResolverOptions,
+    type JwtTenantResolverOptions,
+} from "@suaveplan/api-tenant-resolver-jwt/options";
+import {
+    JwtTenantResolverError,
+    TENANT_RESOLVER_JWT_CODES,
+} from "@suaveplan/api-tenant-resolver-jwt/error-codes";
+
+function safeParse(input: JwtTenantResolverOptions): "ok" | "bad" {
+    try {
+        parseJwtTenantResolverOptions(input);
+        return "ok";
+    } catch (e) {
+        if (
+            e instanceof JwtTenantResolverError &&
+            e.code === TENANT_RESOLVER_JWT_CODES.INVALID_OPTIONS
+        ) {
+            return "bad";
+        }
+        throw e;
+    }
+}
+```
+
+## API Reference
+
+- `interface JwtTenantResolverOptions` — `{ id?: string; claimKey?: string; requirePrincipal?: boolean }`.
+- `function parseJwtTenantResolverOptions(input)` — `Required<Pick<JwtTenantResolverOptions, "id" | "claimKey" | "requirePrincipal">>`. Throws `JwtTenantResolverError(INVALID_OPTIONS)`.
+
+## Implementation Notes
+
+The Zod schema is `.strict()` — unknown keys reject at parse time. This is
+intentional: a downstream caller passing a misspelt field (e.g.
+`claim_key` instead of `claimKey`) would otherwise see the field silently
+ignored and the resolver fall back to defaults, masking the configuration
+bug behind a hard-to-trace "no tenant resolved" failure mode. The parser
+runs once at construction so the per-request hot path operates on
+fully-resolved `Required<…>` values without re-validation.

docs/api-stack/api/api-tenant-resolver-jwt/src/resolver/resolver.md

@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+# `resolver`
+
+<!-- begin:auto-docs -->
+_(no submodules)_
+<!-- end:auto-docs -->
+
+## Purpose
+
+Implements The tenant resolver factory `createJwtTenantResolver`. The
+resolver reads the tenant identifier from an already-resolved `Principal`
+attached by an earlier `api-auth-*` chain step and projects it into a
+`TenantContext`. When the configured claim is present the resolver returns
+that context (the chain short-circuits); when absent it returns `null` so a
+subsequent header / subdomain resolver can take over.
+
+The resolver is intentionally trivial — it does no JWT verification of its
+own (that is `api-auth-jwt`'s job) and no network I/O. Its value is making
+the data-flow explicit: the host wires `auth → tenant-resolver-jwt → next`
+and the conformance suite gets to test the empty/missing-tenant edge cases
+uniformly without coupling the auth and tenant contracts.
+
+## Features
+
+- `createJwtTenantResolver(opts?)` factory returning a
+  `TenantResolver` conforming to `@suaveplan/api-types/tenant-resolver`.
+- Dependency-injected `getPrincipal` extractor: defaults to reading
+  `(request as { principal }).principal`, override for host wiring backed
+  by a `WeakMap` or `AsyncLocalStorage`.
+- Configurable `claimKey`: defaults to `"tenantId"` (reads
+  `Principal.tenantId`); any other key reads `Principal.claims[key]` and
+  brand-casts the string to `TenantId`.
+- Strict-mode `requirePrincipal`: when `true`, a missing principal or a
+  missing claim throws `TENANT_RESOLVER_JWT.PRINCIPAL_MISSING_TENANT_ID`
+  rather than returning `null`.
+- Pure read-path: no module state, no async beyond the `Promise<…>` shape
+  required by the contract.
+
+## Usage: Basic
+
+```ts
+import { createJwtTenantResolver } from "@suaveplan/api-tenant-resolver-jwt/resolver";
+
+const resolver = createJwtTenantResolver();
+const ctx = await resolver.resolve(request);
+if (ctx) {
+    // → { id: "acme" as TenantId, slug: "acme" }
+}
+```
+
+## Usage: Advanced
+
+```ts
+import type { Principal } from "@suaveplan/api-types/principal";
+import { createJwtTenantResolver } from "@suaveplan/api-tenant-resolver-jwt/resolver";
+
+const principals = new WeakMap<Request, Principal | null>();
+
+const resolver = createJwtTenantResolver({
+    id: "jwt-primary",
+    claimKey: "tid",
+    requirePrincipal: true,
+    getPrincipal: (req) => principals.get(req) ?? null,
+});
+
+// host wiring (api-auth-jwt would do this in production):
+principals.set(request, { id: "u" as never, scopes: [], claims: { tid: "acme" } });
+
+const ctx = await resolver.resolve(request);
+// → { id: "acme" as TenantId, slug: "acme" } — short-circuits the chain
+```
+
+## API Reference
+
+- `type PrincipalExtractor = (request: Request) => Principal | null | undefined`.
+- `interface CreateJwtTenantResolverOptions extends JwtTenantResolverOptions { getPrincipal?: PrincipalExtractor }`.
+- `function createJwtTenantResolver(options?): TenantResolver` — returns
+  `{ id, resolve(request) }`. `resolve` returns
+  `Promise<TenantContext | null>`; throws
+  `JwtTenantResolverError(PRINCIPAL_MISSING_TENANT_ID)` only when
+  `requirePrincipal: true` and the principal / claim is absent.
+
+## Implementation Notes
+
+The resolver brand-casts the claim value to `TenantId` without further
+validation: the principal has already passed an `api-auth-*` adapter that
+owns the verification of the JWT signature and the trust boundary. Re-validating
+here would duplicate work the host already performed. Empty-string claim values
+are treated as absent so a misconfigured signer can never accidentally route
+all traffic into a tenant whose slug is the empty string.
+
+The default `PrincipalExtractor` reads `request.principal`, which works for
+the simple host wiring (mutate the request once after auth resolves) but
+falls down for environments where the `Request` is frozen (Workers, certain
+edge runtimes). In those cases pass an explicit `getPrincipal` backed by a
+`WeakMap<Request, Principal>` populated by the auth middleware.